|
|
|
CARGO CULTSociologyindex, Sociology Books 2011 Since the time E E. Williams characterized what was to be called the `cargo cult' phenomenon as a kind of `madness,' though this characterization has been widely challenged by anthropologists, 'madness' has continued to haunt `cargo cult' discourse. A form of millenarian movement (a belief in what is to come) found in the islands of Melanesia in the South Pacific. The cargo cults involve the belief that ritual activities and observances will lead to the arrival of free cargoes of goods. The cargo cults are a development from the indigenous belief that necessary goods and animals for food and supplies are released by the gods or guardian spirits when the people have completed proper ritual observances. The cargo cults show the influence of the modern world in that the cargoes are expected to arrive by boat or plane as do the goods and supplies used by white immigrants and colonizers. The cargo cults have proved to be enduring even when cargo does not materialize, since this is seen as a sign that ritual observation and activity has been inadequate or inappropriate. Cargo cults and discursive madness Ever since E E. Williams (1979a[1923], 1979b[1934]) characterized what was to be called the `cargo cult' phenomenon as a kind of `madness,' even though this characterization has been widely challenged by anthropologists, 'madness' has nonetheless continued to haunt `cargo cult' discourse. Williams' essay was a plea to recognize and preserve the functionality of traditional ritual, which he viewed as primarily an outlet for emotions which, once denied ritual expression, found a liberation in cargo cult `madness.' Yet in his view this 'madness' by definition did not have the same functionality as did traditional ritual. He therefore thought that the useful aspects of 'traditional' culture should be preserved while the bad ones, like those manifest in the liminal dysfunctionality of `cargo cults,' should be done away with.
Williams' evolutionist notion that this deluded, irrational behavior would eventually give way to greater rational comprehension was soon displaced by explanations that focused even more on its functional utility and cultural sense, which had the advantage of at least accounting for why so-called `cargo cults' never went away. What has been identified (Lutkehaus 1995; Bruner 1986) as a transformation between two literary modes - from `narratives of decline' to `narratives of resistance' - thus took place in anthropology and, as Lindstrom (1993) has shown, what was originally thought strange was thereby culturally and functionally nativized and normalized. Now often thought of as Melanesians' standard way of doing things, it is widely held that `cargo cults' do not really exist as discrete phenomena. Capitalizing on Complicity: Cargo Cults and the Spirit of Modernity on Bali Island
(West New Britain) |
|
|
|