Sociology Index

 

 

Books, E-Books Great Discounts

GENERALIZED OTHER

Sociologyindex, Sociology Books 2012, Symbolic InteractionIntersubjectivity, Generalized Other

In their behavior and social interaction individuals react to the expectations of others, orienting themselves to the norms and values of their community or group.

The term `Generalized Other'  was used by George Herbert Mead (1863-1931) to refer to an individual's recognition that other members of their society hold specific values and expectations about behavior.

Contemporary sociocultural theories of the development of the self in society need to explain how the social becomes personal and how development can occur in each domain. George Herbert Mead' s concept of the `Generalized Other' gives an account of the social origin of self-consciousness while retaining the transforming function of the personal. Contextualized in Mead's theory of intersubjectivity, the Generalized Other is a special case of role-taking in which the individual responds to social gestures, and takes up and adjusts common attitudes. By role-taking people adjust and adapt in exchanges based on social gesture-response action sequences. Self-consciousness is developed through action in the social domain that is completed in personal reflection. The paper traces the development of the Generalized Other concept in Mead's published and unpublished work, locating it within the framework of intersubjectivity and role-taking. A theoretically and historically embedded interpretation of the Generalized Other reveals that both the personal and the social evolve and each is open to activities that bring about change. Grounded in Mead's refusal to reduce the part played by the social or the personal in the development of the self, the Generalized Other is a concept of continuing usefulness to development psychologists. - The Personal and the Social - Mead's Theory of the `Generalized Other' - Agnes E. Dodds, Jeanette A. Lawrence, Univ.of Melbourne, Jaan Valsiner, Univ.of North Carolina

Attribution and Symbolic Interaction: An Impasse at the Generalized Other 
George V. Zito, Jerry Jacobs, Syracuse University, Human Relations, Vol. 32, No. 7, (1979)
Attribution theory and symbolic interactionism have developed independently of each another, although both are concerned with the processes employed by ordinary people to make sense of their everyday world. It was inevitable that developments in the one should at last collide with certain well-established tenets of the other. Recent developments in attribution theory respecting differential attributions by Ego of the causes of his own and Alter's behaviors seem to collide with Mead's notion of the Generalized Other. The authors seek to define the current impasse, which they see as further confounding the problem of intersubjectivity.

An International 'Generalized Other': The Social Negotiation of Moral Authority at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda - DR. MAYA STEINITZ, NY University
Abstract: The international criminal courts (ICCs) - the ad hoc International Criminal Tribunals for the Former-Yugoslavia and for Rwanda, the recently-established permanent International Criminal Court, and hybrid internationalized tribunals such as the Special Court for Sierra Leone - are the international community's attempt to address the worst of the criminal manifestations of racism, nationalism and large-scale xenophobia. Based on five months of ethnographic research at the international criminal tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), analyzed using Erving Goffman's dramaturgical framework, this article examines the means through which moral authority is constructed and communicated by the ICTR. Specifically, the article advances the argument that the ICCs seek to personify the Generalized Other; that they claim to embody the universal authority and morality of the international community. The generalized other is an organized and generalized attitude with reference to which individuals define their conduct. The Generalized Other and institutions help socialize people in different parts of society to have the same responses, interests, and moral beliefs and conceptions of selves needed for understanding and synchronizing with others. It is through interactions - immediate and mediated - with Generalized Others that the self arises and is negotiated; that stigmatization of individuals and groups occur; that social concepts are defined; and that psychological citizenship manifests. Therefore, the interplay between inclusion and exclusion, hegemony and diversity in institutions that have the potential not only to communicate for, but also to embody and personify the international Generalized Other, as well as the very existence of such social institutions, is of great social significance. 
The analysis of the ethnographic data traces the three dimensions of jurisdiction - geographical jurisdiction (space), temporal jurisdiction (time) and subject-matter jurisdiction (story) - which are also the three dimensions of theater and of reality. In describing the negotiation of each dimension the article explores the philosophical notion that law qua law claims legitimate and supreme authority and the sociological notion that courts, including international criminal courts, are among the most significant institutions to perform, dramaturgically speaking, such claims by explaining that, more specifically, courts try to fashion themselves as the embodiment of a truly universal Generalized Other proclaiming the universal morality of the international community. In contrast to that projected unity, a close decoding of the face-to-face interactions, the performances, which give rise to the abstraction the ICTR demonstrate that the negotiated reality that is the ICTR (and by implication, ICCs generally) is an emergent of and, at least to a degree, a reflection of cultural and gender differences and diversity. Whether or not one concludes that the ICTR's projection is successful, the attempt has profound implications for the formation of the self and citizenship of individuals in the international sphere. - papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=905340

Pronouns, Proximity, and the Generalized Other - Guy, Rebecca F.; Allen, Donald E. 
Experiment supporting the crux of Mead's discussion describing the development and projection of the social self. Use of pronominal references seems to be an indicator of the dimensions of the interaction process. - eric.ed.gov

The Generalized Other and Me: Working Women's Language and the Academy. 
Authors: Belanoff, Pat 
Discusses the teacher's obligation to help students utilize language which sounds and feels like their own, while helping them to master a language which opens up a larger, wider, deeper world for them and their teachers. - eric.ed.gov

Women as generalized other and self theory: A strategy for empirical research 
Journal Sex Roles, Subject Behavioral Science, Issue Volume 8, Number 3 / February, 1982
Forrest A. Deseran, William W. Falk, Louisiana State University, USA 
Abstract Following the argument that women as generalized other (Mead, 1934) could be empirically explored in much the same manner as self concepts, a variant of Kuhn's (1960) twenty statements test was applied to an examination of perceptions of women in general and of the relationship between self concepts and conceptions of women. College men and women were asked to reply to the questions Who are they (women)? and Who am I? in 20 open-ended responses. Content analysis of the statements revealed findings both consistent and inconsistent with other sex-role research findings.
This article is a revised version of a paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Sociological Association, March 1978, Houston, Texas. Development of this paper was partially supported by the Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station as a contribution to LAES grants H-1970, S-114, and S-120. Appreciation is expressed to Janet Heinmiller, Julie Selby, Gloria Earnest, Kim Dutton, Mary Mahon, and Karen Olivier for their assistance. Authors are listed alphabetically and share equally in credit and responsibility. - springerlink.com

 

 

Books, E-Books Great Discounts

Sociology Index

Sociology Books 2012

Sociology Topical Subject Index