|
Books,
E-Books Great Discounts
| |
Interpretivist and Interpretivism
Sociologyindex, Sociology Books 2011, Interpretive Theory, Interpretivist-Interpretivism,
The interpretivist tradition in sociology developed largely as a criticism of the
dominant theory of positivism. Interpretivist sociologists do not necessarily reject the
positivist account of scientific knowledge, but what they do question is the idea that the
logic and methods of natural science can be imported into the study of societies. Max
Weber (18641920) was one of the main influences on the interpretivist tradition in
sociology. - Dr Steve Taylor.
"Interpretivist" because the information that is gathered is interpreted.
Interpretivism is a thesis about what determines legal rights and duties, i.e. what makes
it the case that the law requires what it does. As such, it is a thesis about the nature
of law.
Interpretivist Theories of Law
Interpretivism about the nature of law is the view that legal rights and duties are
determined by the scheme of principle that provides the best justification of certain
political practices of a community: a scheme identifiable through an interpretation of the
practices that is sensitive both to the facts of the practices and to the values or
principles that the practices serve.
Interpretivism has been developed by Ronald Dworkin in a number of publications over the
last 30 years or so (see the works of Dworkin cited in the Bibliography). Interpretivism
as developed by Dworkin includes the claim that interpretation is sensitive to values in
the way just explained, and that it is fundamental to the nature of law. Many theorists
accept that, given the law, interpretation that is sensitive to values is necessarily
employed in its application (e.g. Brink 2001). In this entry, we shall be concerned
exclusively with interpretivism as a theory about the nature of law, and so we shall not
consider such views (except as possible misunderstandings of interpretivism). We shall
focus on the explanation of the position defended by Dworkin (though not necessarily on
his way of defending it), and briefly consider some alternatives in respect of the
normative character of legal interpretation.
The arrival of interpretivism in the scene, previously dominated by positivist and natural
law theories about the nature of law, has stimulated a great deal of debate. -
Stavropoulos, Nicos, "Interpretivist Theories of Law", The Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL
<plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/law-interpretivist/>.
| |
Books,
E-Books Great Discounts
|