State-sponsored Terrorism and Involvement of States in Terrorism are phrases loosely used in Sociology of Terrorism to describe terrorism committed by nation-states. The assassination of two Iranian nuclear scientists indicates Involvement of States in Terrorism. In October 1965, Homi Jehangir Bhabha, an Iranian, was assassinated. Iran’s senior-most nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, an Iranian, was assassinated on 27th November, 2020. Fakhrizadeh has been compared by The New York Times to J Robert Oppenheimer, who was responsible for the development of the world’s first atomic weapons.
Violent activities committed by a state against civilians are forbidden by international conventions and are clearly defined as “war crimes” when it is a war situation and as “crimes against humanity” in other situations. Involvement of states in terrorism have led to the international delegitimation of the use of violence against civilians by military personnel and political leaders, it is still not clear as to the use of violence against civilians by organizations or individuals on political grounds.
States may be involved in terrorism in different ways: from general support for terrorist organizations, through operational assistance, initiating or directing attacks, and up to the perpetration of terrorist attacks by official state agencies. Involvement of states in terrorism is places states under the general category of “terrorist states,” or “state sponsored terrorism.”
States supporting terrorism - States that support terrorist organizations, providing financial aid, ideological support, military or operational assistance.
States operating terrorism - States that initiate, direct and perform terrorist activities through groups outside their own institutions.
States perpetrating terrorism - States perpetrating terrorist acts abroad through their own official bodiesmembers of its security forces or its intelligence services, or their direct agents. States intentionally attacking civilians in other countries in order to achieve political aims without declaring war.
State Terrorism and Globalization - The Cases of Ethiopia and Sudan. - Asafa Jalata, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, Vol. 46, No. 1-2. This article compares the essence and effects of Ethiopian and Sudanese state terrorism by focusing on the commonalities between the two states. These peripheral African states have used global and regional connections and state terrorism as political tools for creating and maintaining the confluence of identity, religion, and political power. Ethiopia primarily depends on the West, and Sudan on the Middle East, since Christianity and Islam are the dominant religions in these African states respectively.
The Global War on Terrorism and State Terrorism - Stohl, Michael. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES. Abstract: It is often proclaimed that the events of 9/11 changed "everything." Building upon the arguments of Duvall and Stohl (1983), and Stohl (1988), this paper will examine the impact that the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) initiated by the Bush Administration has had on the use of repression and state terrorism in those states which joined the counter terrorism coalition constructed by the United States. To do so it will employ data from the political terror scale and examine the changing conditions within these states over the past half decade.
Terrorism by the State - Cindy C. Combs. Abstract: "Internal" state terrorism involves the use of violence and intimidation by state officials and institutions against the citizens of the state to gain their submission to authoritarian rule. At least three levels of internal state terrorism have been identified as useful gradations in understanding the scope of terrorism practiced by the state. There are at least two other forms of state terrorism that have become prevalent in recent years. Clandestine state terrorism involves a direct, but not open, participation by state agents in terrorist activities. Surrogate terrorism is where a state provides resources and technical assistance of surrogates whose activities are viewed by the supporting state as helpful to their aims in dealing with other countries and opposing ideologies. State terrorism is often served by the booming sale of arms by technologically advanced countries to such countries as Libya and Iran, who make no secret of their propagation of terrorism.
The ghosts of state terror: knowledge, politics and terrorism studies
Richard Jackson ,Department of International Politics, Aberystwyth University, UK. Abstract: Employing a discourse analytic approach, this paper examines the silence on state terrorism within the broader terrorism studies literature. It is argued that the absence of state terrorism from academic discourse functions to promote particular kinds of state hegemonic projects, construct a legitimising public discourse for foreign and domestic policy, and deflect attention from the terroristic practices of states. The exposure and destabilisation of this dominant narrative also opens up critical space for the articulation of alternative and potentially emancipatory forms of knowledge and practice.
State and state-sponsored terrorism in Africa: the case of Libya and Sudan
Strategic Review for Southern Africa, May, 2008 by Lyle Pienaar. ABSTRACT: This article aims to describe past and present state sponsorship of international terrorism in Africa. The case studies include Libya, a previous state sponsor of international terrorism, and Sudan, currently on the United States' list of state sponsors of international terrorism. The case studies consider the history of these two countries as sponsors of international terrorism; the international community's attempts to prevent their involvement in international terrorism; how Libya succeeded in being taken off the United States' list; and Sudan's efforts to join Libya as a country that is no longer seen as a sponsor of international terrorism.
Bringing the state back into terrorism studies - Blakeley, Ruth. European Political Science, Volume 6, Number 3, September 2007.
Abstract: Orthodox terrorism studies tend to focus on the activities of illiberal non-state actors against the liberal democratic states in the North. It thus excludes state terrorism, which is one of a number of repressive tools that great powers from the North have used extensively in the global South in the service of foreign policy objectives. I establish the reasons for the absence of state terrorism from orthodox accounts of terrorism and argue that critical-normative approaches could help to overcome this major weakness.
State terror, terrorism research and knowledge politics - Jackson, Richard, 2008.
Employing a discourse analytic approach, this paper examines the silence on state terrorism within the broader terrorism studies literature. An analysis of this literature reveals that state terrorism is noticeable mainly for its absence as a subject of systematic academic study. It is argued that the absence of state terrorism from academic discourse functions to promote particular kinds of state hegemonic projects, construct a legitimizing public discourse for foreign and domestic policy, and deflect attention from the terroristic practices of states. The exposure and destabilisation of this dominant narrative also opens up critical space for the articulation of alternative and potentially emancipatory forms of knowledge and practice.
State Terrorism and Taboo: Contemporary Anthropological Perspectives on and Approaches to the Study of State Terrorism - Sluka, Jeff. Presented at the ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES.
Abstract: This paper begins by providing an overview of contemporary anthropological perspectives on and approaches to the study of state terrorism. The paper then concludes by presenting a power-conflict theory of modern state terrorism fundamentally relating it to three dominant global trends of the past half-century, growing inequality, increasing oppression and human rights abuses, and the massive growth of state power in the world today.