It has been argued by some that the lower class have developed and transmit to their children, a different set of cultural values and expectations. They argue further that lower class culture is a barrier to their success in society. The lower class culture theory is controversial and is opposed by situational theory, which locates the genesis of poverty in economic and social structures of society rather than in the value orientations of individuals or groups.
Used in this way lower class culture is associated with the culture of poverty thesis - The theory that certain groups and individuals tend to persist in a state of poverty because they have distinct beliefs, values and ways of behaving that are incompatible with economic success.
More recently sociologists have rejected this emphasis on values and argue that structural barriers create the conditions which might generate these values and expectations. If this is so, the solution is to transform the structures and not to blame the poor.
Walter Miller submits that delinquency is not rooted in the rejection of middle class values; it stems from lower class culture, which has its own value system. Gang norms are simply the adolescent expression of the lower class culture in which the boys have grown up.
Strain theorists explain criminal behavior as a result of the frustrations suffered by lower class individuals deprived of legitimate means to reach their goals.
Oscar Lewis coined the term "culture of poverty" to describe the lower-class culture of modern Mexico City.
Culture-of-poverty Thesis is similar to lower class culture theory, where it has been argued that the lower class have developed and transmit to their children, a different set of cultural values and expectations. It is also argued that this culture is a barrier to their success in society.
Theories of Crime and Delinquency
Cohens delinquent subculture
According to Cohen, middle class values are different than lower class values. Middle class values stress independence, success, academic achievement, delayed gratification, control of aggression, and respect for property. Lower class parents encourage different values in their children. In lower class families ambition and planning must give way to pressing issues of the moment. They depend more on others, and have more of a group orientation, watching each others backs.
In school, lower class children are bombarded with the same middle class values that middle class children get in their home. However, these values seem foreign to lower class students. In addition, the values and norms they have learned in their homes actually present a barrier to success in school. The message lower class students get from school is that they are inferior.
They can accept this message and accept their lower status, or they can adapt to the values of the middle class and strive for middle class goals, or they can take the delinquent solution: They can reject the assumption that middle class values are better and turn middle class norms and values upside down. Members reward and esteem each other for behaviors that attack the middle class values (vandalism, terrorizing good kids, stealing just for fun).
The Big 5 Stages:
1. Lower class youth given different values in the home, that is, socialization but want middle class dream of success.
2. School merit system is biased toward middle class values, lower class start out disadvantaged because they were not prepared with middle class values at home. Here lower class youth experience status frustration.
3. Lower class youth start collective interaction, begin to hang out together because they dont fit in with the mainstream of the school.
4. Collective reaction formation, since doors are closed for them they go in the opposite direction of middle class values, they reject the system (instead of feeling rejected by the system)
5. Form a delinquent subculture with anti-middle class value system.