MASCULINE FEMALE
Androgyny, Masculinization
By mixing the notions of gender
and sex this term 'masculine female' identifies those of the female sex who demonstrate
features of the masculine gender.
Mindful and Masculine: Freeing Women Leaders From the
Constraints of Gender Roles
Christine Kawakami, Judith B. White & Ellen J. Langer
Journal of Social Issues, Volume 56 Issue 1 Page 49 - Spring 2000 Volume 56 Issue 1
Despite gains in women's status, successful leaders are more likely to be men than women.
The styles that successful leaders set tend to be masculine. Female leaders face a
paradox: If they emulate a masculine leadership style, their male subordinates will
dislike them. If they adopt a stereotypically warmand nurturing feminine style, they will
be liked, but not respected. Two experiments found that female leaders who are mindful can
escape this paradox. In an experiment, college-aged men perceived a woman who was
masculine and mindful to be a better leader than a woman who was masculine and mindless. A
second experiment replicated that result with middle-aged businessmen. -
blackwell-synergy.com
Deviations from Conventional Sex-Role Behavior: Effect of
Perceivers' Sex-Role Attitudes on Attraction - Deborah Richardson, Sandy Bernstein, Clyde
Hendrick
Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1980, Vol. 1, No. 4, Pages 351-355
Abstract: Eighty research participants who were either traditional or nontraditional in
their attitudes toward women rated their attraction toward male or female stimulus
strangers who were either masculine or feminine in expressed sex-role preferences. Results
replicated previous findings of a preference for stimulus persons who express
"appropriate" sex-role interests, with feminine males being rated most
negatively. However, as predicted, this effect was moderated by the attitudes toward women
held by the research participants. Traditional participants showed a strong attraction
preference for masculine male and feminine female strangers, but nontraditional
participants were relatively nondiscriminating in their preferences. As attitudes slowly
shift in a more egalitarian direction, individuals should become less constrained by
current sex-role stereotypes. However, in view of the fact that all participants showed
some degree of relative dislike for feminine males on all measures, freedom of role
expression may remain more difficult for males than for females. -
leaonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15324834basp0104_6
Is it Sex or Personality? - The Impact of Sex-Stereotypes
on Discrimination in Applicant Selection - Doris Weichselbaumer, Department of Economics,
University of Linz
Abstract: This paper investigates, whether differential treatment of men and women in the
labor market is due to unobservable differences in productivity or if it is motivated by a
taste for discrimination. While studies on sex-discrimination typically control for human
capital, there is usually no information on personal traits available. We argue,
personality might affect productivity just as human capital. To gather the necessary data
a field experiment is conducted: Job applications of candidates, who are equivalent in
their human capital but differ in sex and indicated personality are sent out in response
to job advertisements. We find minor indicators, that signaling a masculine personality
might reduce unfavorable treatment of women, nevertheless discrimination prevails even
after controlling for personal characteristics.
Extract: The goal of this paper is the following: If drawing on sex-stereotypes in a
situation of incomplete information is responsible for womens unfavorable treatment
in the labor market, this disadvantage should disappear when a female applicant reveals
her masculinity. This is tested by comparing the labor market outcomes of man and a
masculine women, who are not only matched in terms of human capital, but even in
personality. If they are treated differently although their expected productivity is
identical, than discrimination has been identified undeniably.
"Detailed application material was constructed for three candidates of identical
human capital: a male, a masculine female and a feminine female. The gender identity was
manipulated by indicators such as hobbies and photographs. According to a pretest all
three applicants were perceived as equally social desirable, while the "feminine
female" was perceived to possess less masculine but more feminine traits than the
other two.
The "masculine female" and the male candidate only differed with respect to
sex."
"Since the male and the masculine female are equivalent in all possibly productive
characteristics (human capital and personality), they should be treated the same. If one
of the two was invited to an interview but the other was not this was attributed to
discrimination."
"If personality matters, then - absent of discrimination - the relative success of
the feminine female should depend on the sex stereotype of an occupation: In traditionally
female professions femininity is particularly acknowledged, consequently the feminine
female should be most successful while the other two should fare less but equally well. In
traditionally male professions masculinity is highly valued, so we expect the
feminine woman to be the least successful, while the male and masculine female are treated
equally favorably.
Results: The experimentally gained data is presented to give a systematic comparison of
the successrates of different applicants (m = male, mf = masculine female, ff = feminine
female) for the different tested occupations.
Masculine occupations: As was argued, the masculine female, who proves to obtain the
required masculine characteristics, should be treated like the male applicant, while the
feminine female should fare less successful since she does not provide these traits. Her
unfavorable treatment would base on a profit-maximizing decision and could not be assigned
to discrimination."
SEX AND DELINQUENCY - A PARTIAL TEST OF THE MASCULINITY HYPOTHESIS - Journal:
CRIMINOLOGY Volume:17 Issue:3 Dated:(NOVEMBER 1979)
F T CULLEN ; K M GOLDEN ; J B CULLEN
Corporate Author: Sage Publications, Inc United States
Annotation: THIS RESEARCH TESTS THE HYPOTHESIS THAT ATTITUDES ASSOCIATED WITH MALE STATUS
OR MASCULINITY CONTRIBUTE TO CRIMINAL DELINQUENT INVOLVEMENT, AND THAT A MORE MASCULINE
FEMALE WILL BE MORE LIKELY TO ENGAGE IN CRIME.
Abstract: DESPITE THE FREQUENCY WITH WHICH THIS MASCULINITY HYPOTHESIS APPEARS, IT HAS
RECEIVED FEW EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENTS AND THOSE THAT DO EXIST ARE LIMITED. TYPICALLY, SUCH
RESEARCH UTILIZES GROUP-LEVEL DATA TO MAKE INFERENCES ABOUT INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR. IN
CONTRAST, THIS STUDY OF SELF-REPORTED INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR PRESENTS A PRELIMINARY BUT
ADEQUATE EMPIRICAL TEST OF A COMPONENT OF THE MASCULINITY PROPOSITION. A NONRANDOM SAMPLE
OF 182 SUBJECTS WHOSE MEAN AGE WAS 18.8 WAS DRAWN FROM STUDENTS ATTENDING A MIDWESTERN
UNIVERSITY. INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL DATA WAS USED TO TEST THE MASCULINITY PROPOSITION. RESULTS
SUPPORTED THE MASCULINITY HYPOTHESIS: INDEPENDENT OF GENDER, MALE TRAITS APPEARED TO
CONTRIBUTE TO DELINQUENT INVOLVEMENT. MOREOVER, EVEN INDEPENDENT OF MALE TRAITS, MALES
WERE STILL FOUND MORE LIKELY TO ENGAGE IN DELINQUENCY THAN FEMALES. THUS, WHILE
TRADITIONAL MALE TRAITS DO LEAD TO INCREASED DELINQUENCY FOR BOTH SEXES, THE PERSISTENT
EFFECT OF SEX ON DELINQUENCY SUGGESTS THAT OTHER UNMEASURED STRUCTURAL, PSYCHOLOGICAL, OR
PHYSIOLOGICAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH GENDER LEAD MEN TO ENGAGE IN MORE DELINQUENCY THAN
DO WOMEN. NOTES AND REFERENCES ARE GIVEN.
|