|
Books,
E-Books Great Discounts
| |
PAN-INDIANISM
Sociologyindex, Sociology Books 2012
The
term 'Pan-Indianism' has been applied to social movements among both Asian Indians and
North American First Nations peoples.
In
both contexts Pan-Indianism refers to a social movement and a political philosophy that
asserts a peoples' common identity and unity across political or state boundaries and
tribal divisions.
Howard
defined the concept of pan-Indianism as follows:
By pan-Indianism is meant the process by which sociocultural entities such as the Seneca,
Delaware, Creek, Yuchi, Ponca, and Comanche are losing their tribal distinctiveness and in
its place are developing a nontribal Indian culture. Some of the elements in
this culture are modifications of old tribal customs. Others seem to be innovations
peculiar to pan-Indianism. (Howard 1955:214)
Pan-Indianism is, in my opinion, one of the final stages of progressive
acculturation, just prior to complete assimilation. It may best be explained as a final
attempt to preserve aboriginal culture patterns through intertribal unity. How long this
pan-Indian culture will continue is dependent on a number of largely unpredictable
factors, such as economic conditions, population shifts, and future miscegenation. (Howard
1955:220)
Robert Thomas (1965) summarizes the essential new ideas with regard to the
concept pan-Indianism as follows:
One can
legitimately define Pan-Indianism as the expression of a new identity and the institutions
and symbols which are both an expression of that new identity and a fostering of it. It is
the attempt to create a new ethnic group, the American Indian; it is also a vital social
movement which is forever changing and growing (Thomas 1965:75)
Pan-Indian
institutions such as Indian centers in cities, Pow Wow committees and so forth are
institutions through which Indians can have some productive relationship to the general
society. (Thomas 1965:81)
Pan-Indianism is the creation of a new identity, a new ethnic group, if you will, a new
nationality in America. (Thomas 1965:82)
I guess to a lot
of people powwow means celebration, bringing people together, enjoying the festivities
that are there. Today the powwow system has changed. It´s more competitive. ...Now, there
is another situation there too, where the Crees on the northern plains treat the powwow
almost as a spiritual atmosphere. - Wade Baker, a Hidatsa Grass Dancer and singer.
My working definition of the term powwow is a social gathering of people who
are celebrating various aspects of Indian culture, be they religious, social, or, in many
cases, both. (Lita Mathews)
Pan-Indianism and Indigenous Organizations in Ecuador
Prepared for delivery at Indigenous Peoples: An International Symposium, University of
Nebraska-Lincoln, April 8-9, 1997.
Abstract: As in the rest of Latin America, Ecuadorians have viewed the aboriginal
inhabitants of their country as simply "Indians." The presence of ten distinct
ethnic groups which remain in Ecuador and the fact that the sense of place has been local
rather than regional or national, however, challenges this label. Nevertheless, recent
organizational actions in Ecuador have relied on a sense of group identity that
transcended narrow tribal categories. There has been, however, little study of the
historical development of this pan-Indian consciousness. In the context of the United
States, Hertzberg and Cornell have looked at how a supra-tribal 'Indian" identity
emerged in the United States out of such factors as the boarding school movement,
urbanization, changes in federal government policy, imposition of the English language,
and inter-tribal marriages. Pan-Indian organizations, such as the early twentieth-century
Society of American Indians, emerged out of urban, elite Indian professionals who had
largely become separated from their tribal roots. Arguably, similar factors are also at
work in Ecuador. Often pan-Indian organizations in Ecuador are directed by people who went
to Quito to study or otherwise had extensive contact with the dominant Spanish culture.
Understanding these roots of inter-tribal contacts and a pan-ethnic identity is important
because it indicates whether Indian nationalism is a function of contact with western
notions of state formation, or whether it grows out of Indigenous forms of social
organization. Furthermore, it is important to ask whether these movements are led by
organic intellectuals who truly represent Indigenous concerns or whether over the years
urban-based Indigenous leaders have become divorced from local Indigenous realities. To
what extent to elite leaders remain representative of group issues, and are smaller
Indigenous groups being marginalized in an ethnic discourse which is dominated by the
numerically superior Quichua population? - yachana.org/research/confs/lincoln97.html
Early Pan-Indianism: Tecumseh's Tour of the Indian Country, 1811-1812.
Authors: Sugden, John
Abstract: Tecumseh's tour of 1811-1812 was a remarkable effort involving 3,000 miles and
contacts with 8-12 of the present American Indian tribes. Tecumseh's success owed much to
standing grievances of the Indians and the disposition of the British, but depended also
upon timely occurrences such as Harrison's engagement on the Tippecanoe. - eric.ed.gov
The Contest Powwow - a cultural expression of Pan-Indianism? -
Dr. Rainer Hatoum - userpage.fu-berlin.de/~relwiss/
VW-Stiftung/Rainer%20english.html
Abstract: As will be demonstrated, the terms powwow and
pan-Indianism and their meanings are an disadvantageous starting point to
answer the central question stated in heading. Therefore, no specific answer is sought in
this paper.
On one hand, we have the term powwow. Because of the historical evolution of
this term, and its plethora of everyday connotations, the term is in and of itself
nondescript. Thus, I have limited my interests to the more concrete notion of
contest powwow to be used as a prototype concept of powwow in this
article. As will be argued, this is a notion also shared predominantly by Native Americans
themselves today.
On the other hand, two extreme positions exemplify different theoretical traditions of
thought in respect to the concept of pan-Indianism. The concept went through a
parallel theoretical reorientation as it was taking place in the general American
anthropology at that time. With a changing interest from acculturation and assimilation
processes towards topics related to and centered around the term ethnic
identity, not only the general meaning of the concept pan-Indianism
changed. Both theoretical traditions left, even beyond the academic context, basic
assumptions concerning the general relations between the two phenomena contest
powwow and pan-Indianism. At both of their cores is the thought that the
phenomenon powwow represents a cultural expression of
pan-Indianism.
In dealing with the first set of assumptions, which is basically centering around the
general understanding of cultural exchange, I will try to get away from the burdened
discussion concerning the terms acculturation and assimilation. Instead, I will try to
push questions concerning the people involved, the purpose of adoption (actually
adaptation), general opportunities, attractivity and thus, bringing cultural compatibility
to the forefront, as factors for cultural exchange.
Starting point of the second group of assumptions centering around the term ethnic
identity was the implication that the phenomenon powwow is an expression
of a new identity as Native Americans. This notion is caught in the characterization of
the powwow as a vehicle of pan-Indianism. In accordance with the
examples cited, I will argue that the phenomenon powwow is not so much an
expression of a new ethnic identity, even though it is definitely producing a
new quality of an existing identity as Native Americans. Rather, I will stress the point
that powwows as a field of action and interaction as well as a stage offer the
opportunity to meet new needs in a state of drastically changing social conditions.
Furthermore, the cited examples will show that one cannot reduce the event
powwow to the factors ethnic identity and meeting new
needs. Factors immanent to the event itself, as the aspect of contest, show an
obvious motivating and activating impact. -
Short Extract: The question whether one can consider the powwow as a cultural
expression of pan-Indianism or not, relates therefore to a discourse in
anthropology based on theoretical grounds, which goes beyond specific examples. The
discussion on the concepts and phenomena pan-Indianism and powwow
demonstrate, therefore, results of anthropological work on a regional basis. In this
context it is interesting to note that the specific theoretical foundations of the concept
pan-Indianism were laid mainly in the course of a period of about twenty
years. The 60s and early 70s witnessed in this respect the most intensive period of
theoretical discussion on this concept. This is even more interesting in so far as there
was a major theoretical new orientation within the American anthropology at the same
period of time.
The Acculturation of American Indians
Evon Z. Vogt, Harvard University
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 311, No. 1,
137-146 (1957) DOI: 10.1177/000271625731100115 © 1957 American Academy of Political &
Social Science
Despite all the pressures for changing the ways of American Indians into those of the
white man, there are still basically Indian systems of social structure and culture
persisting with variable vigor within conservative nuclei of Indian population. The author
outlines a conceptual framework for the analysis of American Indian acculturation in
different areas of the United States, provides a brief synoptic review of the degree of
acculturation in such areas, and discusses the limiting factors to full acculturation by
comparing the situation of the United States with that of Mexico, and considers the
development of "Pan- Indianism" as an emerging stage in the acculturation
process. - ann.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/311/1/137
Ablon, Joan
1964 Relocated American Indians in the San Francisco Bay Area: Social Interaction and
Indian Identity. Human Organization 24:296-304.
Ashworth, Kenneth
1986 The Contemporary Oklahoma Pow-Wow (Native American). Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation.
The University of Oklahoma.
Blundell, Valda
1985 Une Approche Sémiologique du Powwow Canadien Contemporain. Recherches Amérindiennes
au Québec 15(4):53-66.
Campisi, Jack
1975 Powwow: A Study of Ethnic Bourndary Maintenance. Man in the Northeast 9:33-46.
Duncan, Jimmy W.
1997 Hethushka Zani`: An Ethnohistory of the War Dance Complex. Unpublished M.A. thesis.
Northeastern State University, Tahlequah, Oklahoma.
Foster, Morris W.
1991 Being Comanche: A Social History of an American Indian Community. Tucson-London: The
University of Arizona Press.
Eggan, Fred
1966 The American Indian: Perspectives for the Study of Social Change. Chicago: Aldine.
Hagan, William T.
1961 American Indians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hertzberg, Hazel W.
1971 The Search for an American Indian Identity: Modern Pan-Indian Movements. Syracuse:
Syracuse University Press.
Hiribayashi, James, William Willard, and Luis Kemnitzer
1972 Pan-Indianism in the Urban Setting. In: Thomas Weaver and Douglas White (eds.); The
Anthropology of Urban Environments. Society for Applied Anthropology, Monograph 11, pp.
77-87.
Howard, James H.
1955 The Pan-Indian Culture of Okalhoma. Southwest Journal of Anthropology 8(5):215-220.
1995 The Ponca Tribe. [1965]. Lincoln-London: University of Nebraska Press.
1976 The Plains Gourd Dance as a Revitalization Movement. American Ethnologist 3(2):243-
259.
Lassiter, Luke E.
1998 The Power of Kiowa Song. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
Josephy, Alvin M., Jr.
1968 The Indian Heritage of America. New York: Bantam Books.
Kracht, Benjamin R.
1994 Kiowa Powwows: Continuity in Ritual Practice. American Indian Quarterly 18(3):321-
348.
Laudin, Harvey G.
1973 The Shinnecock Powwow: A Study of Culture Change; A Study of the Process of
Acculturation. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation; School of Education of New York University.
Lerch, Patricia B., and Susan Bullers
1996 Powwows as Identity Markers: Traditional or Pan-Indian? Human Organization
55(4):390-395.
Lurie, Nancy O.
1965 An American Indian Renascence? Midcontinent American Studies Journal 6(2):25-50.
1971 The Contemporary American Indian Scene. In: Eleanor B. Leacock and Nancy O. Lurie
(eds.); North American Indians in Historical Perspective. New York: Random House.
Mathews, Lita
1999 The Native American Powwow: A Contemporary Authentication of a Cultural Artifact.
Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation. University of New Mexico.
Newcomb, W. W. Jr.
1955 A Note on Cherokee-Delaware Pan-Indianism. American Anthropologist (57):1041-1045.
1956 The Culture and Acculturation of the Delaware Indians. Papers of the Museum of
Anthropology, University of Michigan (10).
Petrullo, Vincenzo
1934 The Diabolic Root: A Study of Peyotism. Philadelphia: Universtiy of Pennsylvania
Press.
Powers, William K.
1966 Feathers Costume. Powwow Trails 3(7-8):4-14, 19.
1968 Contemporary Oglala Music and Dance: Pan-Indianism Versus Pan-Tetonism.
Ethnomusicology 12(3):352-372.
1990 War Dance: Plains Indian Musical Performance. Tucson-London: The University of
Arizona Press.
Price, John A.
1968 The Migration and Adaptation of American Indians to Los Angeles. Human Organization
(27):168-175.
Sanford, Margaret
1971 Pan-Indianism, Acculturation, and the American Ideal. Plains Anthropologist
16(53):222- 227.
Thomas, Robert K.
1965 Pan-Indianism. Midcontinent American Studies Journal 6(2):75-83.
Vogt, Evon Z.
1957 The Acculturation of the American Indians. Annals of the American Academy of
Political and Social Science (311):137-46.
Wissler, Clark
1916 General Discussion of Shamanistic and Dancing Societies. American Museum of Natural
History, Anthropological Papers 11(12):853-876.
Young, Gloria A.
1981 Powwow Power: Perspectives on Historic and Contemporary Intertribalism. Unpublished
Ph.D. Dissertation. Indiana University.
Pan-Indian organizations
| |
Books,
E-Books Great Discounts
|