Books, E-Books Great Discounts

RATIONALIZATION

Sociology Index, Sociology Books 2012

Max Weber's works deal with rationalization in sociology of religion, government, organizational theory, and behavior. The process of rationalization affects economic life, law, administration, and religion.

Rationalization makes ends of means and imprisons the individual within the ‘iron cage’ of rationalized institutions, organizations, and activities.

Within symbolic interactionism, rationalization is used more in the everyday sense of the word to refer to providing justifications or excuses for one's actions.

The term 'rationalization' has two specific meanings in sociology:

(1) The concept 'rationalization' was developed by German sociologist Max Weber (1864-1920) who used it in two ways.

First, it was the process through which magical, supernatural and religious ideas lose cultural importance in a society and ideas based on science and practical calculation become dominant. For example, in modern societies science has rationalized our understanding of weather patterns. Science explains weather patterns as a result of interaction between physical elements like wind-speed and direction, air and water temperatures, humidity, etc.

In some other cultures, weather is thought to express the pleasure or displeasure of gods, or spirits of ancestors. One explanation is rationalized and scientific, the other mysterious and magical.

Rationalization also involves the development of forms of social organization devoted to the achievement of precise goals by efficient means. It is this type of rationalization that we see in the development of modern business corporations and of bureaucracy. These are organizations dedicated to the pursuit of defined goals by calculated, systematically administered means.

(2) Within symbolic interactionism, rationalization is used more in the everyday sense of the word to refer to providing justifications or excuses for one's actions.

Max Weber's Types of Rationality: Cornerstones for the Analysis of Rationalization Processes in History. - Kalberg, Stephen
American Journal of Sociology, v85 n5 p1145-79 Mar 1980
Abstract: Explores rationality in Max Weber's works and identifies four types of rationality which play major roles in his writing--practical, theoretical, substantive, and formal. Implications for society and education are discussed. (DB)

Vanished Vediators: On the Residual Status of Judges in Max Weber's Theory of Legal Rationalization - Sahni, Isher-Paul. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association.
Abstract: The centrality of judges in Max Weber’s theory of legal rationalization and their residual status in his ‘Sociology of Law’ are discussed. The vital role he assigns to judges is exposed by privileging his frequently overlooked discussion of the anti-formalistic tendencies in modern law. Their neglect in his comparative examination of the Continental and the English administrations of justice is explained by foregrounding the influence exerted on him by the ideals of Pandectist jurisprudence, as revealed in his Critique of Stammler, and by the politico-legal context in which he wrote, as evinced by his assessment of the Free Law Movement.

The City : Rationalization and freedom in Max Weber - DOMINGUES J. M.
Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Department of Sociology, Rio de Janeiro, BRESIL
Philosophy & social criticism ISSN 0191-4537 2000, vol. 26, no4, pp. 107-126 (1 p.3/4)
Abstract: Weber's piece on the development of the north-European Western city has not commanded attention in the recent theoretical literature. This article argues that it can however provide fresh insights into some key problems of Weber's diagnosis of modernity and into his general sociological theory, especially as to his theory of action and creativity. A more open-ended conception of modernity can be gained from its analysis, which is more compatible with Weber's own methodological assumptions. A different relationship between freedom and rationality may be derived as a theoretical and political consequence from the discussion of The City.

A Subjective Universal: Max Weber and the Modern-Postmodern Divide - Thibodeaux, Jarrett. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting.
Abstract: Looking at Weber’s methodology and concept of rationalization, I explore how his writings relate to modernism and postmodernism. I find that Weber was a postmodernist/minimalist in methodology because of his desire for many narratives rather than one grand narrative. However, in terms of his concept of rationalization he was a modernist/universalist in that he saw rationalization, in how one attempted to achieve a goal, as objectively decipherable and that this objectivity was specific to modern western culture. I go on to show how some common criticisms of Weber relate to this divide in postmodern and modern philosophies in his conceptualizations.

The Conflict between Methodology and Rationalization in the Work of Max Weber
Lars Udehn, Department of Sociology, Uppsala
Acta Sociologica, Vol. 24, No. 3, 131-147 (1981)
Max Weber is the leading representative of an interpretive sociology aiming at an explanation in terms of the motives of the acting individuals. He is also the proponent of the thesis that the Western world is moving in the direction of increasing rationalization, held by many to be the uniting theme of his work. It is the thesis of this paper that there is a conflict between these two themes in Weber's work. The process of rationalization ends in an 'iron cage' of bureaucratic domination. But bureaucracy es capes analysis with Weberian methodology for two reasons: (1) because it is a form of domination which reduces men to means for the bureaucracy and its leaders, thus making their own motives unimportant, and (2) because it is a type of domination which rests upon the acceptance of, and subjection to, a rational legal order. The conclusion is that Weber's methodology is primarily a methodology for the analysis of leaders, since they alone are the determinants of their own actions.

The Dialectics of Religious Rationalization and Secularization: Max Weber and Ernst Bloch, Warren S. Goldstein
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Central Florida. wgoldste@mail.ucf.edu
Critical Sociology, Vol. 31, No. 1-2, 115-151 (2005)
Ernst Bloch stood in intellectual opposition to Max Weber, yet they have a similar framework through which they both analyzed religion. Both Weber and Bloch engaged in a class analysis of the Bible. In Ancient Judaism, Weber provides the historical, political, and socio-economic context in which we can understand the origins of the belief in the Messiah. Bloch's dialectical theory of secularization of Judeo-Christian Messianism into Marxism has a parallel structure to Weber's theory of religious rationalization in Ancient Judaism. For Weber, ancient Judaism experienced a process of religious rationalization that is marked by a dialectic between the charisma of the prophet and the tradition of the priest, between value and substantive rationality, between disaster and salvation. Bloch's dialectical theory of secularization, which takes place from Moses through the prophets to Jesus and from Feuerbach to Marx, views the process of secularization as being driven by a contradiction between faith in God and faith in man. Bloch, who embraced Jewish Messianic beliefs, had hope in the resolution of this dialectical conflict while Weber, who was far more pessimistic, did not. Combining elements from Weber's theory of religious rationalization and Bloch's theory of secularization, provides the basis for a dialectical theory of secularization in which the tensions between the sacred and profane, while driving the process of secularization forward, remain unresolved.

The Rationalization of Everything? Using Ritzer’s McDonaldization Thesis to Teach Weber, Stephen Lippmann and Howard Aldrich
Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Today’s students have grown up in a world structured by the forces of rationalization, making it difficult for them to comprehend the scope and magnitude of the transformations Weber described. In this paper, we outline a plan for helping students appreciate Weber’s theoretical achievements, as well as teaching them to think more critically about what constitutes the “good life” in rationalized societies. We use Ritzer’s best-selling book, The McDonaldization of Society, as a vehicle for encouraging students’ interest in Weber’s work. We describe a set of field exercises that bring Weber to life and provide rich material for active learning.
Max Weber ([1905] 1998; 1946) argued that the process of rationalization, once unleashed upon the world, transformed social life forever. By loosening the hold of custom and tradition, rationalization led to new practices that were chosen because they were efficient, rather than customary. Weber argued that because of the “technical superiority” of the bureaucratic form, it would come to dominate all forms of human organization like an “iron cage” in which humans were eternally trapped. Weber’s ideas continue to inform sociological theorizing today. For example, building on Weber’s insights, the institutional approach has spawned a robust stream of work in organizational sociology (Powell and DiMaggio, 1983; Scott, 1995).
Students have grown up in a world structured by the forces of rationalization, and thus they often have difficulty comprehending the scope and magnitude of the transformations Weber described. Students’ taken for granted world includes fast food, 24/7 operating hours, instant world-wide communications, and other practices described by Ritzer (2000). Because they are immersed in it, the rationalized world seems natural to them, rather than socially constructed. Students who bring this natural and unproblematic view of rationality into a Sociological Theory course pose a challenge to instructors wishing to teach Weber’s ideas on bureaucracy and rationality.
In this paper, we describe a plan for helping students appreciate Weber’s theoretical achievements, as well as teaching them to think more critically about what constitutes the “good life” in rationalized societies. We use Ritzer’s (2000) best-selling book, The McDonaldization of Society, and a set of field exercises to bring Weber to life and provide rich material for active learning in the classroom.

Judicial Reform and Rationalization: The Diffusion of Court Reform Policies Among the American States,  J M Scheb ; A R Matheny
Journal: Law and Policy Volume:10 Issue:1 Dated:(January 1988) Pages:25-42
Abstract: Explaining the diffusion of judicial reform policies among the American States is an elusive task. It begins with Max Weber's sociology of law from which his concept of rationalization is adopted as a schema of policy development. According to Weber, the 'rationalization' of legal institutions would accompany the advancement of capitalism in modernizing nations. Thus, it is expected that specific judicial reform policies expressly aimed at rationalizing the structure and process of State court systems be closely associated with each other and with commonly accepted indicators of economic development among the States. Court reforms are related to broader policy innovations among the States, drawing on earlier 'diffusion of innovations' research. The data indicate a strong connection between judicial reform and more general patterns of innovation diffusion among the States, but provide only modest support for Weber's assertions about the rationalization of legal systems under advancing capitalism. Three of the selected reforms cluster together and are largely explainable by indicators of economic development. Two other reforms do not fit this pattern, and their 'behavior' requires additional discussion and research. Thus, the diffusion of judicial reform policy is partly accounted for by factors found in explanations of general policy innovations across States, but other, as yet unidentified, factors apparently influence certain aspects of judicial reform. 4 tables and 62 references. (Author abstract modified)

Weber's concept of rationalization and the electronic revolution in western classical music
Journal Qualitative Sociology, Publisher Springer Netherlands
ISSN 0162-0436 (Print) 1573-7837 (Online) Issue Volume 1, Number 3 / January, 1979
Valerie Ann Malhotra, Department of Sociology, Texas Woman's University, USA
Abstract In examining the electronic revolution in Western Classical music, this article considers many of the important issues which Weber addresses in his work on the sociology of music—particularly the definitional problems related to Weber's concept of rationalization and the disenchantment of the world. The article examines Weber's concepts of rational action and rationalization in relation to music, then through analysis of developments in electronic music, raises questions regarding Weber's conclusions regarding the effect of rationalization in Western culture.

Books, E-Books Great Discounts